httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <dgau...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: Any objection to not using APR_BUFFERED for logs?
Date Fri, 05 Nov 1999 02:42:22 GMT
as long as they're line buffered... a single write() per log entry is the
best.

Dean

On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:

> I'd like to shut off APR_BUFFERED logging, for a number of reasons:
> 
> - Solaris and maybe others won't let us have more than 255 FILE
>   pointers, limiting our number of log files.
> 
> - Based on the comments I've seen, APR_BUFFERED is on its way out
>   anyway.
> 
> - I don't think the logs should be buffered by default anyway,
>   especially the error log. If we want the access logs buffered,
>   that's what BUFFERED_LOGS is for. It'd be nice to make that a config
>   option, btw.
> 
> - As a nice side effect, it makes fprintf(stderr, ...) work on Unix
>   again. It didn't before, because ap_get_os_file only knows how to
>   get an fd.
> 
> Objections?
> 
> -- 
> Manoj Kasichainula - manojk@raleigh.ibm.com
> IBM, Apache Development
> 


Mime
View raw message