Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 27066 invoked by uid 6000); 11 Oct 1999 19:38:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 27058 invoked from network); 11 Oct 1999 19:38:53 -0000 Received: from fwns1d.raleigh.ibm.com (HELO fwns1.raleigh.ibm.com) (204.146.167.235) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 1999 19:38:53 -0000 Received: from rtpmail02.raleigh.ibm.com (rtpmail02.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.172.48]) by fwns1.raleigh.ibm.com (8.9.0/8.9.0/RTP-FW-1.2) with ESMTP id PAA26038 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:38:16 -0400 Received: from chosondo.raleigh.ibm.com (chosondo.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.73.195]) by rtpmail02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/RTP-ral-1.1) with ESMTP id PAA33472 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:38:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:38:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Ryan Bloom To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Compiling multiple MPM at the same time. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I thought we had this already. I have actually always assumed that in time, the prefork MPM would go away. the pthread MPM actually does exactly what the prefork MPM does as long as it's compiled correctly. Of course, some MPM's can't have this flag. For example, I'm not sure how much sense Dexter makes without threads. :) On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Dean Gaudet wrote: > i'm not sure how good an idea this is... > > i always envisioned compile-time macros such as MPM_HAS_THREADS which > would let modules be built differently according to whether threads were > available or not. > > Dean > _______________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@raleigh.ibm.com 4205 S Miami Blvd RTP, NC 27709 It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers doing simple steps. It's a painful sight to see beginners doing complicated patterns.