Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:30:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ryan Bloom <rbb@raleigh.ibm.com>
To: Apache Developers <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Get rid of child_num, thread_num in MPM's conn_rec?
In-Reply-To: <19990803174358.A8873@dosa.raleigh.ibm.com>
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.04.9908031928190.25291-100000@chosondo.raleigh.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Status: O


Until we have replaced the scoreboard function, I would rather we didn't
take it out of the mpm's completely.  Those two fields are not being used,
because we aren't using the scoreboard, but we will need some way to
identify which child and which thread we are talking about if/when we put
back in the scoreboard stuff.  I put it in the conn_rec, because that is
where it was originally.  I say leave it until we come up with a valid way
to replace the scoreboard in 2.0.

Ryan


On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:

> Any objection to getting rid of child_num and thread_num in the
> conn_rec for MPM? conn_rec is really the wrong place for this stuff,
> and it appears that no code is actually using those fields anymore.
> 
> Patch is attached (OS/2 MPM isn't tested).
> 
> -- 
> Manoj Kasichainula - manojk@raleigh.ibm.com
> IBM, Apache Development
> 

_______________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom		rbb@raleigh.ibm.com
4205 S Miami Blvd	
RTP, NC 27709		It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers 
			doing simple steps.  It's a painful sight to
			see beginners doing complicated patterns.