Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 21156 invoked by uid 6000); 2 Aug 1999 21:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21127 invoked from network); 2 Aug 1999 21:35:05 -0000 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org (204.107.140.52) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 1999 21:35:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17373 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 1999 21:34:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Dean Gaudet To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Where to start the Apache 2.0 code base In-Reply-To: <37A60A02.519EF25F@raleigh.ibm.com> Message-ID: X-Comment: Visit http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Bill Stoddard wrote: > The approches are at odds with each other. IMHO it will be easier to > merge 1.3.8 changes into the apache-mpm/2.0 tree than the otherway > around. agreed. actions > words, camp 1's job is trivial compared to camp 2's job, and no progress can be made while we wait for camp 2. > How important is it to maintain history? I don't see much point in it. +1 > Lets move apache-mpm into the top level apache-2.0 directory, merge in > the 1.3.8 diffs +1 > then version all the files 1.1. I don't see the point, you'd lose the (meagre) revision history we already have in mpm. That revision history is important to the MPM development. It's just numbers. Dean