Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 18560 invoked by uid 6000); 17 Aug 1999 12:56:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 18551 invoked from network); 17 Aug 1999 12:56:15 -0000 Received: from i.meepzor.com (HELO Mail.MeepZor.Com) (root@204.146.167.214) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 1999 12:56:15 -0000 Received: from Golux.Com (ss04.nc.us.ibm.com [32.97.136.234]) by Mail.MeepZor.Com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA06717; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:56:53 -0400 Message-ID: <37B95C37.F7EB01A8@Golux.Com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 08:57:27 -0400 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.9 pre-release tarball available for testing References: <19990817075507.A6323@engelschall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > Sorry when I ask such silly, but why needs someone an autodection for BIND4/8? > What exactly is the issue with Apache here? AFAIK we do not use any specific > BIND4/BIND8 functionality, so why is there a need to dispatch? Dunno. Maybe he has both installed on the same machine? I suspect his include files and/or libraries are hosed. He cited INN and sendmail as having this and 'why not us?' He hasn't answered 'why' yet, though. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies"