Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:37:37 +0200
From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" <rse@engelschall.com>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: APR'izing the mpm tree.
Message-ID: <19990817163736.A47837@engelschall.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Engelschall, Germany.
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org


In article <Pine.LNX.4.04.9908170945410.8566-100000@chosondo.raleigh.ibm.com> you wrote:
 
> Does anybody have a problem with me starting to APR'ize the mpm tree?
> Bill needs this to really get the Win32 port working, without duplicating
> a lot of work.  There are requests for this all over the tree, where Dean
> made notes about an abstraction that people need to do.  I have done 99%
> of those abstractions in APR, and I would love to see them used.
> 
> I'll wait for comments, and start to work later today if nobody veto's.  I
> won't make any commits for this until tomorrow sometime, in case somebody
> wants to veto it later tonight.
> 
> BTW, I have all the code required now, so that there is no reason for my
> APR'izing the tree to break things any more than they currently are
> broken.  :)

Sure, go for it, but please tag the apache-2.0/mpm/ tree once before and once
after you completed the initial transition!

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com