Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 7406 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Aug 1999 14:13:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 7400 invoked from network); 1 Aug 1999 14:13:38 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 1999 14:13:38 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.9.3/jag-2.6) id KAA12830 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 10:13:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199908011413.KAA12830@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Apache 2000, err Apache 2.0 gets real To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 10:13:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <19990801155859.A78733@engelschall.com> from "Ralf S. Engelschall" at Aug 1, 99 03:58:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > > > PS: As an aside, if we feel that we need something like shtool, I would > > prefer Apache releasing it's own "helpers" package. > > Why? What do you expect to gain from this? Why do you still dislike > shtool so much, Jim? Not at all. It's just that the helpers scripts represent a lot of work and could be useful for other projects. It would be nice for Apache to provide that as another ASF "project". -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"