From: "Randy Terbush" <randy@covalent.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: RE: 1.3.8: One more bug...
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 14:33:45 -0500
Message-ID: <009301bee367$42ae2c00$0502a8c0@covalent.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <19990810205431.A25755@engelschall.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Status: O

Then lets back it out.

There were 2 minor changes that needed to go in. The rest of this
stuff is complicating the process.

As for retagging, a new 'tag APACHE_1_3_8' should just move the tags
on the files that have had revision changes since the original tag.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
> [mailto:new-httpd-owner@apache.org]On
> Behalf Of Ralf S. Engelschall
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 1:55 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.3.8: One more bug...
>
>
>
> In article <008e01bee361$94b6e6a0$0502a8c0@covalent.net> you wrote:
>
> > Lets commit this and then can we retag and roll 1.3.8? Ken?
>
> But Martin comitted a change related to DBM_LIB, too.  This
> is a half-way
> solution and should be either backed out or made complete.
>
>                                        Ralf S. Engelschall
>                                        rse@engelschall.com
>                                        www.engelschall.com
>