Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 9758 invoked by uid 6000); 10 Aug 1999 15:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 9694 invoked from network); 10 Aug 1999 15:00:14 -0000 Received: from cookie.covalent.net (208.214.57.1) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 1999 15:00:14 -0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cookie.covalent.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id KAA08803 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 10:00:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from randy@covalent.net) Received: from blanca.covalent.net(192.168.2.5), claiming to be "blanca" via SMTP by mail.covalent.net, id smtpdF18804; Tue Aug 10 10:00:05 1999 From: "Randy Terbush" To: Subject: RE: binary builds currently broken!, was Re: Apache 1.3.8 pre-release tarball available for testing Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 10:00:05 -0500 Message-ID: <007401bee341$07c6c8c0$0502a8c0@covalent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <007201bee340$c515b9a0$0502a8c0@covalent.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O And references to htdocs > I'm seeing the following: > > 1. This only affects the cgi-bin and icon directory munging. > 2. If we add into the configuration default files the > absolute path of > /usr/local/apache, all is well. > > Agreed? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: new-httpd-owner@apache.org > > [mailto:new-httpd-owner@apache.org]On > > Behalf Of Tony Finch > > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 9:33 AM > > To: new-httpd@apache.org > > Subject: binary builds currently broken!, was Re: Apache 1.3.8 > > pre-release tarball available for testing > > > > > > Cliff Skolnick wrote: > > > > > >I still see the problem with the httpd.conf created for > > the binary install. > > >Does anyone else see 404's for a fresh server instead of > > the congradulations > > >page? I see it on two different solaris2.7 machines. I > > sent in a patch but > > >I noticed no one commented on it so I though I was mistaken. > > > > > >Can someone else create a binary install and check this > > out on other > > >platforms? > > > > I have duplicated this problem on FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE and > > Solaris 2.6, > > and I think it's rather worse than you thought -- the patch > > you posted > > recently doesn't completely fix the problem :-( As well as > > the problem > > with DocumentRoot in the installed httpd.conf, all the > > sections aren't specific enough ( rather than > > ), and the Aliases are > > similarly > > broken. > > > > The problem is as follows: binary distributions are supposed to be > > independent of the ServerRoot that the server was > compiled with, so > > all the paths that are used are relative. However, http.conf needs > > the absolute path to be inserted wherever @@ServerRoot@@ > > appears, but > > when all the configure stuff runs the @@ServerRoot@@ stuff is > > stripped. > > > > I think that quite a lot of fiddling with the various scripts is > > needed to fix this properly because of various > assumptions all over > > the place. > > > > Tony. > > -- > > f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net e pluribus unix > > >