From: "Randy Terbush" <randy@covalent.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Win 95 and 98.
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 09:16:57 -0500
Message-ID: <000701bee8bb$2a02af60$0502a8c0@covalent.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.04.9908170948460.8566-100000@chosondo.raleigh.ibm.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

I agree. +1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: new-httpd-owner@apache.org 
> [mailto:new-httpd-owner@apache.org]On
> Behalf Of Ryan Bloom
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 8:54 AM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Win 95 and 98.
> 
> 
> 
> I would like to consider no longer supporting 95 and 98 on 
> Apache 2.0.  Of
> course, we will do anything possible to make these 
> platforms work, but MS
> doesn't consider these to be server platforms.  Why do we 
> continue totell
> people Apache works on them.
> 
> I suggest that in 2.0, we put in a warning, basically 
> saying that Apache
> is no longer a Beta on NT, but that on 95 and 98, we make 
> no garauntees.
> It will work to the best of our abilities, but if it is 
> slow, or doesn't
> have all the options, there is nothing we can do about it.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Ryan Bloom		rbb@raleigh.ibm.com
> 4205 S Miami Blvd	
> RTP, NC 27709		It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers 
> 			doing simple steps.  It's a painful sight to
> 			see beginners doing complicated patterns.	
>