httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Laurie <>
Subject Re: Apache 2000, err Apache 2.0 gets real
Date Sun, 01 Aug 1999 11:51:20 GMT
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
> In article <> you wrote:
> > [...]
> > After that, set up autoconf as the one and only configuration tool.
> > I happen to like automake as well, but I'd at least like to figure out
> > why Ralf isn't using it first.  Same with libtool.
> > [...]
> Autoconf, libtool and shtool are fine and I use them all the time. The reasons
> why I avoid Automake are partly technical reasons and partly aesthetical
> reasons. Technically Automake conflicted often with my opinion on how _clean_
> and non-redundant Makefiles should look and behave. The aesthetical reasons
> are mainly related to the fact that Automake-generated Makefiles I often have
> to consider "bloatware". There are 1001 generated targets one never needs and
> which just cause confusion and problems.

This seems to apply to autoconf, too, so why single out automake for




"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi

View raw message