httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Rasins <sa...@dns.omniport.net>
Subject Re: 1.3.8: One more bug...
Date Wed, 11 Aug 1999 03:01:21 GMT
> IMHO(WC), there are too many things tied together here.
> There's the SERVER_VERSION, the release, and the revision
> tag.  How about, when we're ready to do X.Y.Z:
>
> 0. int n = 1; go to review-then-commit;
> 1. Change the SERVER_VERSION to X.Y.Z;
> 2. Tag as APACHE_X_Y_Z_RCn;
> 3. Test;
> [++n and repeat 2 & 3 until things are clean]
> 4. Release;
> 5. Tag as APACHE_X_Y_Z;
> 6. update SERVER_VERSION to X.Y.Z(+1)-dev;
> 7. Go back to commit-then-review.
>
> That way we'll be able to use whichever is the final clean
> tarball for our release without this messy SERVER_VERSION
> frobbing in each iteration.  And no-one should be running
> anything with a version of X.Y.Z except those who got it
> after release, or testers who will hopefully know better
> than to report a bug against it without upgrading. :-)
>
> Just a thought off the top of my head.
> -- 
> #ken    P-)}

If my vote counts at all ... +1 ... great idea, Ken ... and well written!


Sambo	P-)
<Sambo@Caribe-Enterprises.com>

Do not read this fortune under penalty of law.
Violators will be prosecuted.
(Penal Code sec. 2.3.2 (II.a.))

{NOTE: The [random] quote above was provided via the 'fortune' program.}

Mime
View raw message