httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Randy Terbush" <ra...@covalent.net>
Subject RE: 1.3.8: One more bug...
Date Tue, 10 Aug 1999 20:31:01 GMT
This looks complete to me looking at the CVS mails.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: new-httpd-owner@apache.org 
> [mailto:new-httpd-owner@apache.org]On
> Behalf Of Rodent of Unusual Size
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 3:19 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.3.8: One more bug...
> 
> 
> Randy Terbush wrote:
> > 
> > Then lets back it out.
> > 
> > There were 2 minor changes that needed to go in. The rest of this
> > stuff is complicating the process.
> > 
> > As for retagging, a new 'tag APACHE_1_3_8' should just 
> move the tags
> > on the files that have had revision changes since the 
> original tag.
> 
> Curses.   I just retagged the files that changed (modulo the
> ones that shouldn't get retagged, like httpd.h and CHANGES).  Here
> is the list:
> 
> configure
> htdocs/manual/vhosts/mass.html
> src/ApacheCoreOS2.def
> src/ap/ap_sha1.c
> src/helpers/binbuild.sh
> src/helpers/find-dbm-lib
> src/main/http_main.c
> src/modules/experimental/mod_auth_digest.c
> src/modules/standard/Makefile.OS2
> src/support/Makefile.tmpl
> src/support/httpd.8
> src/support/httpd.exp
> 
> Which ones of those should be RE-re-tagged back to the revs
> they were before I re-tagged them to-day?  Is what's there in
> HEAD now actually broken compared to what it was in 1.3.7-dev?
> If not, then it don't get fixed now!
> 
> No more turd polishing, please, people.  One more confusion
> in this and I'm going to declare 1.3.8 a total loss, and
> we go to 1.3.9.
> -- 
> #ken    P-)}
> 
> Ken Coar                    <http://Web.Golux.Com/coar/>
> Apache Software Foundation  <http://www.apache.org/>
> "Apache Server for Dummies" <http://ASFD.MeepZor.Com/>
> 

Mime
View raw message