httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Randy Terbush" <>
Subject RE: That shtools discussion
Date Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:23:20 GMT
At the risk of resurecting this discussion (which is not my intent), I
would like to say that I support Jim's and others position that using
shtools is not desireable. When this does come to a vote, you can be
assured of seeing mine. Nuf said.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> []On
> Behalf Of Jim Jagielski
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 7:12 AM
> To:
> Subject: That shtools discussion
> First of all, let me be the first to admit that I have some strong
> opinions. I think that pretty much goes without saying :) but
> I realize that. However, I've always felt that my opinions are
> based on what's best for Apache. Also, AFAIK, I've never let
> my opinions block what the rest of AG has wanted to do. Sometimes,
> because maybe I'm a bit more vocal, it appears that I'm the only
> one to feel a certain way. For example, during the shtool debate
> I got the impression that Ralf thought it was "just me" and said
> a few things like "OK Jim, I can't change your opinion so we'll
> just let it go". This implies that I'm being some solitary stick
> in the mud, which isn't the case. I think, as with most things,
> some people agree with me (and have said so), other don't,
> and others
> couldn't care less :) Unfortunately, sometimes it reduces to the
> impression that it's Jim against Ralf or Biff vs. Terence
> instead of it being 2 (or more) groups of thought.
> I certainly did not want to imply anything against shtool or Ralf
> in the discussion.
> --
> ============================================================
> ===============
>    Jim Jagielski   |||   |||
>             "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
>             cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

View raw message