Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 23574 invoked by uid 6000); 29 Jul 1999 23:30:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 23511 invoked from network); 29 Jul 1999 23:30:11 -0000 Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net (195.11.55.83) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 1999 23:30:11 -0000 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 3.02 #13) id 119zcg-000BF7-00 for new-httpd@apache.org; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:30:02 +0100 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: Apache 2000, err Apache 2.0 gets real In-Reply-To: <37A0C7BB.C6A2B4E5@Golux.Com> References: <37A0C2B7.8BB584F9@raleigh.ibm.com> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:30:02 +0100 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > >I'd like to see a new module opened with a name that has nothing >to do with a version number. I don't particularly care for >'sandbox,' though; maybe 'apache-future' or 'apache-exp'? That's a bit too one-off; I'd suggest either a date (apache-1999 -- 2000 is an over-used number) or a codename (if someone can come up with somthing along the same lines as shambhala that would be cool). Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net e pluribus unix