Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 2739 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Jul 1999 22:55:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2731 invoked from network); 9 Jul 1999 22:55:35 -0000 Received: from server.noc.demon.net (HELO noc.demon.net) (193.195.224.4) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 1999 22:55:35 -0000 Received: by noc.demon.net; id XAA19556; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 23:55:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma019535; Fri, 9 Jul 99 23:55:19 +0100 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 3.02 #13) id 112jY7-00039i-00 for new-httpd@apache.org; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 23:55:19 +0100 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: newbie thread/process model question in hybrid server In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 23:55:19 +0100 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O Dean Gaudet wrote: >On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Tani Hosokawa wrote: > >> It would also let you consolidate all your log writing into one burst to >> make your disk activity more efficient... Like with IIS, where you can set >> it to only log when its got 'x' bytes to write to disk. I do that right >> now using a piped log, but it might be more efficient if it was done in >> the server. > >-DBUFFERED_LOGS That reduces the number of syscalls performed by Apache but has the disadvantage of requiring a post-processor to sort them. I don't think there is a way of getting around that problem. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998