Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 29840 invoked by uid 6000); 27 Jul 1999 09:59:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29786 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 09:59:26 -0000 Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (194.128.162.193) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 1999 09:59:26 -0000 Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA04472 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:58:24 GMT Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA25831 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: <379D82C0.B31FD6D5@algroup.co.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:58:24 +0100 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Group plc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Getopt problem... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Would it be worth it to put getopt into apr? > > Just asking, but it seems that windows needs one, and there has been talk > of providing one for any system that doesn't provide optreset. > > Thoughts? +1 Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi