From new-httpd-owner-new-httpd-archive=hyperreal.org@apache.org Wed Jul 14 22:34:17 1999 Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 7965 invoked by uid 6000); 14 Jul 1999 22:34:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7950 invoked from network); 14 Jul 1999 22:34:15 -0000 Received: from houston.matchlogic.com (205.216.147.127) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 14 Jul 1999 22:34:15 -0000 Received: by houston.matchlogic.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <3631G55L>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:33:42 -0600 Message-ID: <64003B21ECCAD11185C500805F31EC0302D7578A@houston.matchlogic.com> From: Charles Randall To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] 10x performance increase patch #1 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:33:41 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O So, how do we get to the next step where we get to see the patches that enhance performance? Do you want to resolve the issues with the first patch first, or publish a second which assumes the first? Anxiously yours, -Charles From: mja@trudge.engr.sgi.com [mailto:mja@trudge.engr.sgi.com] >It seems most of the differences you cited can be understood best as >simply programmer's preference. The goals of this patch are to make >Apache compile warning-free and run on 64-bit Irix. These goals are >important to me. I'm certainly willing to bend selecting among >equivalent implementations.