httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Gaudet <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] AP vs APR prefix change in Apache...
Date Fri, 09 Jul 1999 21:07:11 GMT

On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Michael H. Voase wrote:

> 	Pth is one of the reasons I started looking
> at this api mapping method . The issue that gets at me
> is that pth wont provide any benefit to SMP boxen . Once
> the scheduler starts , your stuck on one proccessor . 

It would be easy to write an mpm which spawned multiple processes, and
used pth in each process.  That's what mpm is about. 

> 	If you guys are going to put pth in apr then

I don't know where ya got the idea we were putting pth in apr... 


View raw message