Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 28200 invoked by uid 6000); 11 Jun 1999 18:43:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 28045 invoked from network); 11 Jun 1999 18:43:06 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 1999 18:43:06 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.9.3/jag-2.6) id OAA08985; Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:25:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199906111825.OAA08985@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: mod_macro To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 14:25:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I was thinking... since we will most likely be adding the mass-vhost module (a special module to be sure) I would like us to (re)consider mod_macro (http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/~coelho/mod_macro/). I've found mod_macro to be very useful and, most likely, would have wider appeal to the general Apache community than the mass-vhost module would (this is NOT saying that mass-vhost shouldn't be added, not at all). I personally think something like this would be very useful. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"