httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Behlendorf <br...@hyperreal.org>
Subject Re: standard virtual hosting.. how good?
Date Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:16:56 GMT
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Why do we bother having stuff in STATUS and "voted" on and then
> commited (with a note beforehand "if anyone has problems, let us know")
> if a week or so later people will say "you know, we should just do
> it differently." Isn't that what STATUS is for?

I realize it was a week late, and that it had already been committed, but
I didn't want Dean's comments to go unsupported since I agreed with them.

> No matter what, the stat is useful for apache -t. If we want to drop
> the directive and have it do the stat for -t then that's fine, but
> it sure would be nice if these were brought up beforehand :)

I think this would be the best approach, as Dean suggested.  

	Brian



Mime
View raw message