httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Finch <>
Subject Re: overloaded functions
Date Tue, 29 Jun 1999 03:54:43 GMT
Dean Gaudet <> wrote:
>the typeof thing would work just fine if C required a warning for: 
>char *y;
>unsigned char *x = y;
>... I suppose someone could add such a warning to gcc ;)  I wonder what
>it'd catch.  ISTR such a switch existing, but can't find it right now.


"There is no reason to _use_ this option; it exists only to satisfy pedants."

Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998

View raw message