httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: standard virtual hosting.. how good?
Date Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:20:19 GMT
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Why do we bother having stuff in STATUS and "voted" on and then
> > commited (with a note beforehand "if anyone has problems, let us know")
> > if a week or so later people will say "you know, we should just do
> > it differently." Isn't that what STATUS is for?
> 
> I realize it was a week late, and that it had already been committed, but
> I didn't want Dean's comments to go unsupported since I agreed with them.
> 
> > No matter what, the stat is useful for apache -t. If we want to drop
> > the directive and have it do the stat for -t then that's fine, but
> > it sure would be nice if these were brought up beforehand :)
> 
> I think this would be the best approach, as Dean suggested.  
> 

I think Dean just suggested removing the stat. Tony was the one who
made the extremely valid point that keeping it for -t made sense.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message