Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 29264 invoked by uid 6000); 4 May 1999 23:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 29251 invoked from network); 4 May 1999 23:36:52 -0000 Received: from gateway.simutronics.com (198.83.204.1) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 4 May 1999 23:36:52 -0000 Received: from icon-stl.net (andy.finkenstadt.com [198.83.204.55]) by gateway.simutronics.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA16826 for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 18:36:24 -0500 Message-ID: <372F844D.CFAFA159@icon-stl.net> Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 18:35:41 -0500 From: Andrew Finkenstadt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Mindcraft, part II - anyone want to help? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I've written a thank-you note to mindcraft. I will be very interested to see the results and the process of getting there. If a mailing list is set up to support the tuning efforts, I'd love to know where it is so I can watch and learn. Andy Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > Mindcraft has a response to the criticisms out there - "OK, help us come > up with a good benchmark". Thus: > > http://www.mindcraft.com/openbenchmark.html > > Chris DiBona at VA Research is trying to organize a testing rig - if > anyone can help from the Apache tuning side of things (Dean? Cliff? > Marc?) send him an email at chris@dibona.com. > > Thanks! > > Brian -- Andrew Finkenstadt (http://www.finkenstadt.com/andy/) "I know the answer's in there, the server's just too busy!" --Anon