Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 18101 invoked by uid 6000); 17 May 1999 18:49:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 18092 invoked from network); 17 May 1999 18:49:32 -0000 Received: from slarti.muc.de (193.149.48.10) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 17 May 1999 18:49:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 918 invoked by uid 66); 17 May 1999 18:50:04 -0000 Received: from en by slarti with UUCP; Mon May 17 18:50:04 1999 -0000 Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Sendmail 8.9.3+3.2W) for new-httpd@apache.org id UAA37271; Mon, 17 May 1999 20:47:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:47:04 +0200 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] select-thread-hybrid-01.patch Message-ID: <19990517204703.A37171@engelschall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i Organization: Engelschall, Germany. X-Web-Homepage: http://www.engelschall.com/ X-PGP-Public-Key: https://www.engelschall.com/ho/rse/pgprse.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 00 C9 21 8E D1 AB 70 37 DD 67 A2 3A 0A 6F 8D A5 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org In article you wrote: >> - completely reindented the source code > > dude! why? Now we can't inherit patches from the isc! I've not done this extraction for Apache! It was for a project where local changes will be done and where I control the stuff myself. In such situation I always want the same coding style for all involved sources. And it's no problem for me as long as I know that I'll have no problem in inheriting fixes from the origin. And for such small libs which already are stable this isn't usually a problem for me... Ralf S. Engelschall rse@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com