httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Hyde <bh...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Pools in apr types.
Date Sat, 15 May 1999 01:05:18 GMT
Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com> writes:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
...
> > Now if we change the name context to pool your
> > back to the nice workable design used in the current
> > server and you have avoided creating any unnecessary
> > incompatiblities.  Please?
> 
> No, thank you.  IMO, a pool is a primitive data structure,
> and shouldn't have a user-data field in it.

Pants on fire?  You just said that all apr types will
have a user-data field.

The user data field is not the issue.  I find your reply
bewildering since it seem to ignore my issue "unnecessary
incompatiblities"

 - ben

Mime
View raw message