httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Reverse proxy and authentication
Date Mon, 17 May 1999 07:48:26 GMT
Dean Gaudet wrote:

> [Hey Graham, it's more convenient if you send one attachment with the
> whole patch rather than an individual attachments each with one-file
> attachments, thanks.]

Sorry about that - I created a single file patch, then tried to test it
and it wouldn't work. Turned out to be a problem with Solaris patch...

> As Roy might say, "there is no such thing as a reverse proxy".  He's
> referring to the fact that if you read the rfc you won't find mention of a
> "reverse proxy", only of a proxy.  And strictly speaking, a proxy requires
> absolute URIs, for example, so this application is definately not an
> *http* proxy.  The core's concept of proxy is closer to that of an http
> proxy...

Reverse proxy isn't mentioned in any proxy rfc because on the frontend a
reverse proxy as actually a normal website. There is no way the browser
can tell that the URL it tried to fetch is proxied in any way, only the
laws of HTTP apply here.

This is where the problem lies. When authentication is added to a
reverse proxied URL using the <Location> braces, mod_proxy starts
talking proxy-speak, because proxy-speak is the only language it has
been programmed to speak. The browser receives "Proxy-Authentication:",
but because the browser is speaking HTTP to the website, and not Proxy,
it disregards the response as an error, and authentication doesn't work.

> The problem I see here is that really what the proxy module is being used
> as here is as a special purpose database for fetching response objects.

This is exactly how it's behaving, yes.

> Why does it set proxyreq = 1?  If there were a module which was fetching
> objects from a db and caching them locally we wouldn't be setting proxyreq
> = 1 for that module... how is this "reverse proxy" different?

I don't know - I don't fully understand how the rest of Apache responds
to proxy requests, and my approach was to keep the behavior the same as
it was, just change the authentication.

Basically Apache seems to be using the proxyreq variable to answer the
question "Is this request a proxy request?". Trouble is, it's too vague
a question, because in reality a proxy request can take two forms:

Proxy frontend <--> Proxy backend (normal proxy)
HTTP frontend <--> Proxy backend (reverse proxy)

What the patch tries to do is turn this two-state variable (proxy/no
proxy) into a three state variable (reverse/normal/none) in a way that's
backward compatible with the rest of the code. Ideally there should be a
simple way of determining whether the frontend is Proxy or HTTP so that
we can speak the correct language to the browser when it submits a
request.

Is there a better way of doing this?

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm		"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
						tonight...

Mime
View raw message