httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Parker <>
Subject Re: Legal Inclusion of mod_ssl in the Standard Distribution of 1.3.7
Date Fri, 07 May 1999 15:57:48 GMT
IANAL and I suspect neither are you....

Just because one district has ruled this way does not make it
"disappear" for everyone.  Even then, did you read the decision? what
did it really say? I haven't seen too many details on this whole
deal.  I imagine that nothing can really be done til the Supreme Court
hears the case which is what the judges recommended.  Even then, there
is no guarantee that new laws won't be passed to fill the hole this
has opened up.


On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 07:31:23PM +0300, Eli Marmor wrote:
> (I am not subscribed to neither mod_ssl list nor new-httpd lists, so
> please CC me to any reply).
> Following the new rule regarding to inclusion of encryption code in
> an Open-Source packages (which you can read about in zillion places
> like:
> and others), I propose the following:
> While Apache rules the web servers field, with about 60% (including
> its derivatives), and no rivals (IIS has only 24%, Netscape is close
> to zero), its presence is much weaker in the field of secure web
> servers, including sites of e-commerce, etc. IMHO, one of the
> reasons for this situation is that for newbies it is very hard to
> install SSL for Apache, while in the "competitors" it is already
> integrated. Contrary to other modules, this module is not part of
> the standard distribution of Apache, because of legal issues.
> Now, that these legal issues disappear, Apache has a great
> opportunity to change the picture. I don't know what is going with
> Apache 1.3.7 (where have the STATUS reports gone?), but I think it
> may be a real revolution if mod_ssl can be included with the
> standard distribution. It will remove one of the two areas where
> Apache loses in comparisons (the other is the friendliness), and
> will not only help Apache to gain a domination in the secure web
> servers field, but also will strengthen its existing domination in
> the field non secure web servers.
> Thanks for your time and attention,
> -- 
> Eli Marmor

View raw message