Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 1677 invoked by uid 6000); 6 Apr 1999 14:58:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 1614 invoked from network); 6 Apr 1999 14:58:43 -0000 Received: from server.noc.demon.net (HELO noc.demon.net) (193.195.224.4) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 1999 14:58:43 -0000 Received: by noc.demon.net; id PAA13489; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:58:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma013465; Tue, 6 Apr 99 15:58:29 +0100 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 1.73 #2) id 10UXJ7-0004cy-00; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:58:29 +0100 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: [Fwd: MSIE4 & Pragma] In-Reply-To: <199904061324.JAA15877@astro.fccj.cc.fl.us> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 15:58:29 +0100 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org "Bill Jones" wrote: >Brian Schau wrote: >> >> Don't know if you guys know this, but: >> >>> "Pragma: No-cache" Tag May Not Prevent Page from Being Cached (Q222064) >> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q222/0/64.asp > >I am pretty sure that the pragma: no-cache is for PROXY servers only. If you look at the article mentioned you'll see that it refers to a bug in IE related to handling HTML tags, which are of course ignored by proxy caches [1]. They are so broken that no-one should use them. [1] Unlike most proxies, Cache-Flow boxen do parse HTML in order to pre-fetch inline images, but I don't know whether they also pay attention to ... Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net