Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 26028 invoked by uid 6000); 20 Apr 1999 12:36:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 25915 invoked from network); 20 Apr 1999 12:35:54 -0000 Received: from mrelay.jrc.it (139.191.1.65) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 1999 12:35:54 -0000 Received: from jrc.it (elpc51.jrc.it [139.191.71.51]) by mrelay.jrc.it (LMC5692) with ESMTP id OAA01268; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 14:39:41 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <371C749F.6D245B25@jrc.it> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 14:35:43 +0200 From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik Organization: ISIS/STA - Joint Research Center of the European Commission X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD {PEN/1.01} (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: zh,de,en,fr,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org, harrie.hazewinkel@jrc.it Subject: Re: Comments on these 2 ideas References: <199904201207.IAA17200@devsys.jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Jim Jagielski wrote: > The first relates to MaxRequestsPerChild. Our conf files have this set > to 30, yet the hard-coded default if no directive exists is 0. Shouldn't > these be consistant? If so, which should we change? Which IMHO is 'low' these days. I would prefer both to be in the order of a couple of 100, say 500. Even with SunOS which leaks like a sieve that is still an order of magnitude away from trouble area's. Or are there other, worse, platforms ? > Second, it would be "nice" to adjust SCOREBOARD_MAINTENANCE_INTERVAL > without needing to recompile. Granted, this could be considered fluff, > but I would think this useful especially for pre-compiled binaries. > Should I bother generating a patch? Harrie, This is one for you; Does this not fit in with that SNMP thing about increasing log and status levels when you actually want to dynamically monitor more closely when you suspect trouble. ??? Dw.