Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 5834 invoked by uid 6000); 14 Apr 1999 02:19:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 5825 invoked from network); 14 Apr 1999 02:19:17 -0000 Received: from monsoon.dial.pipex.net (158.43.128.69) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 1999 02:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 14770 invoked from network); 14 Apr 1999 02:19:13 -0000 Received: from userca77.uk.uudial.com (62.188.150.145) by smtp.dial.pipex.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 1999 02:19:13 -0000 From: david.whitmarsh@dial.pipex.com (David Whitmarsh) To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Changing Windows dev platform to MSVC++ 6? Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 02:23:46 GMT Organization: Sparkle Computer Co Ltd Message-ID: <3712d6a3.13394096@smtp.dial.pipex.com> References: <37127685.3D92CE28@Golux.Com> In-Reply-To: <37127685.3D92CE28@Golux.Com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:41:09 -0400, you wrote: >I've been told that the output MSVC++ version 6 compiler is >considerably better optimised over V5. Measurably. What's >the general feeling about moving the base Apache development >platform on windows forward from V5 to V6? I've been building, debugging, using, and generally hacking apache on my 95 box with MSVC6 for some weeks with no problems, at least none due to any difference between MSVC5 and MSVC6. I don't see any big issue here. David ************************************ David Whitmarsh Sparkle Computer Co Ltd Sybase C C++ perl UNIX NT ************************************