Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 11902 invoked by uid 6000); 8 Apr 1999 22:25:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 11885 invoked from network); 8 Apr 1999 22:25:18 -0000 Received: from dillinger.io.com (manojk@199.170.88.20) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 1999 22:25:18 -0000 Received: (from manojk@localhost) by dillinger.io.com (8.9.1/8.9.1a) id RAA09343 for new-httpd@apache.org; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:25:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:25:17 -0500 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: apache-apr Message-ID: <19990408172516.A9070@io.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.1i In-Reply-To: ; from unknown@riverstyx.net on Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 02:20:46PM -0700 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 02:20:46PM -0700, unknown@riverstyx.net wrote: > Anyone know where I should be sending feedback about apache-apr? > current-testers doesn't seem to actually have any traffic. I've attempted > to get apache-apr running from a snapshot two days old, and while working > for a short period of time, it hangs. Feedback, patches, etc. can go to this list. Can you provide some details on your problems? -- Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/ "This is not a novel to be tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force." -- Dorothy Parker