httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ben Hyde <bh...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-apr/apr/lib apr_pools.c Makefile.in
Date Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:01:43 GMT

Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com> writes:

> Ben Hyde wrote:
> > 
> > Some of these data types might be better left in the Apache
> > layer, rather than the apr layer since they are possibly
> > not approprate for what's billed as a "portablity" layer
> > versus a "damn useful libray" layer.  I'm guessing the
> > arrays and tables won't be used within apr.
> 
> *shrug*  Regardless of whether it's right or not, I *have*
> been thinking of it as a 'useful library' as well.  'PR'
> is 'portable runtime,' not 'portability runtime' -- at least
> to me.  :-)  That's why the other bits of libap are showing
> up here, even though most of them have little to do with
> portability issues.

Not a big deal in this example, when util_uri.c migrates I
might make a bigger fuss.  - ben

"the narcissism of small diferences."

Mime
View raw message