httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ralf S. Engelschall" <...@engelschall.com>
Subject Re: Back to the roots
Date Wed, 28 Apr 1999 06:53:42 GMT

In article <3726199F.73015193@algroup.co.uk> you wrote:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>> In article <3725AC5D.CF5E54BA@Golux.Com> you wrote:
>> > All right.  I dislike shtool because
>> >
>> > a) it would be maintained separately from the Apache tree, unlike
>> >    all of our other custom required-for-build tools
>> > b) I personally disagree that limiting the number of lines
>> >    displayed by 'ls' should be a goal
>> > c) I personally disagree that combining N distinct and special-
>> >    purpose scripts into one is generally good, much less that
>> >    it is better
>> > d) I dislike the acrimony this (and similar discussions) has
>> >    engendered
>> > e) other reasons, but the above are enough
>> >
>> > At the moment, I cannot think of anything about the concept of
>> > shtool that I *do* like.  That's short.  I suggest we drop
>> > the entire discussion as a 'never mind' idea rather than
>> > encouraging the continuance of this debate.  That's
>> > constructive.
>> 
>> Yeahh, GREAAAT! That's it: The first constructive reply, although it gives a
>> totally bad mark to shtool (but that's ok). Nevertheless that's the replies I
>> like and never see: strong arguments and no rhetoric questions (so I this time
>> I _DO NOT_ feel like I've to fight against something).
> 
> That is such bullshit. [...]

Thanks.
                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com

Mime
View raw message