Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Mar 1999 12:48:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2173 invoked from network); 1 Mar 1999 12:48:19 -0000 Received: from server.noc.demon.net (firewall-user@193.195.224.4) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 1999 12:48:19 -0000 Received: by server.noc.demon.net; id MAA02178; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:48:13 GMT Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma002164; Mon, 1 Mar 99 12:48:04 GMT Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 1.73 #2) id 10HS79-0005C1-00; Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:48:03 +0000 To: new-httpd@apache.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: Apache 2 mutiple pools feature request Newsgroups: chiark.mail.apache.new-httpd In-Reply-To: Organization: Deliberate Obfuscation To Amuse Tony References: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 12:48:03 +0000 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Brian Behlendorf wrote: > >Formalizing this as something that Apache does makes some sense to me; >e.g., having a standard interface to back-end daemons for launching (as >root, setting to a particular UID) / restarting / killing, distributing >requests, etc. Maybe even a standard back-end protocol, like what jserv >uses today. FastCGI? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net