Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 20761 invoked by uid 6000); 22 Feb 1999 08:31:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 20743 invoked from network); 22 Feb 1999 08:31:02 -0000 Received: from valis.worldgate.com (marcs@198.161.84.2) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 1999 08:31:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by valis.worldgate.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA09710 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 01:31:00 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 01:30:59 -0700 (MST) From: Marc Slemko To: Apache Developers Subject: Re: Fwd: Frontpage extensions under Apache 1.3.4 In-Reply-To: <19990222021712.A3337@io.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Manoj Kasichainula wrote: > By no strech of the imagination would I claim that any Apache code > changes are necessary for this, but it's still interesting. The saddest part about the FP extensions for Apache is that Microsoft (well, or RTR; don't know who actually writes the code) could, if they took the smallest effort, make them so much more usable. As someone who is being forced to figure out why they work so badly and make them work better for two bazillion users (especially since each machine has a half bazillion vhosts and fp needs a httpd.conf file to read all the time), they really annoy me. Doing a strings on the fp binaries is enough to make me shudder.