Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 3153 invoked by uid 6000); 27 Jan 1999 01:58:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 3146 invoked from network); 27 Jan 1999 01:58:06 -0000 Received: from imo27.mx.aol.com (198.81.17.71) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 1999 01:58:06 -0000 Received: from Cranstone1@aol.com by imo27.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id JSUQa26290 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:56:02 +1900 (EST) From: Cranstone1@aol.com Message-ID: <5e79b819.36ae7232@aol.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:56:02 EST To: new-httpd@apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: incorporating? (was: Copyright & donating code) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 190 Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org In a message dated 1/26/99 4:13:25 PM MST, fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu writes: << Ugh, talk about mixed metaphors. The simple answer is that we know what we are doing, why we are doing it, and how to turn an army of lawyers into puppy chow if that were ever needed. However, people with armies of lawyers have enough sense not to interfere with Apache -- the corporation is to protect us against pipsqueeks with one lawyer and a serious attitude problem. ....Roy >> Obviously you've never been sued, or for that matter deposed. I'd check those NPO docs if I were you. You don't know what you're doing and that is evident from the tone of your reply. If you were a lawyer you'd know better than to make those kind of remarks, stick to what you know best, you're a programmer with a Ph.D. not a lawyer! ...........Peter J. Cranstone