Message-ID: <36AA2F67.65F8B67B@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 20:21:59 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Organization: A.L. Group plc
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH: srm.conf and access.conf refer to httpd.conf]
References: <199901202133.NAA17084@scv3.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
> 
> | That would break Apache-SSL.
> 
>     How's that? Both srm.conf and access.conf have comments that say "see
> httpd.conf", which should read see "apache.conf", if TARGET=apache. For
> example:
> 
> >From srm.conf-dist:
> # It is processed after httpd.conf but before access.conf.
> 
> >From access.conf-dist:
> # It is processed after httpd.conf and srm.conf.
> 
>   I'm not familiar with Apache-SSL, so obviously I'm ignorant here.
> Are the
> config files way different or something?

No, but with the suggested change, the comments would say "see
httpsd.conf", but we're actually using httpd.conf.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi