Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 13501 invoked by uid 6000); 16 Jan 1999 14:03:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 13486 invoked from network); 16 Jan 1999 14:03:02 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 1999 14:03:02 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.9.2/jag-2.5) id JAA12983 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 09:02:57 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199901161402.JAA12983@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/helpers GuessOS PrintPath TestCompile binbuild.sh buildinfo.sh checkheader.sh find-dbm-lib findcp To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 09:02:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <19990116103117.A13455@engelschall.com> from "Ralf S. Engelschall" at Jan 16, 99 10:31:17 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > Oh friends, now we've already three all-in-one patch rounds which also affect > the APACI code and this makes me _NO LONGER_ happy. Because every patch round > will introduce new problems. I've no problem with "x$x" instead of my > personally preferred ".$x" when Jim really wants this, > I wish people would learn to read. I SAID I had no f*cking preference how we do it, for the simple and singular reason of not upsetting Ralf. I really wish you would stop saying that using 'x' is the way Jim wants it when the honest fact is that the VAST MAJORITY of the shell scripts out there use it. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"