Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 2102 invoked by uid 6000); 5 Dec 1998 21:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2075 invoked from network); 5 Dec 1998 21:36:22 -0000 Received: from mediacons.tecc.co.uk (HELO tr909.mediaconsult.com) (193.128.6.132) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 1998 21:36:22 -0000 Received: from mediaconsult.com (proxy.mediaconsult.com [195.217.36.66]) by tr909.mediaconsult.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA05904; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 21:36:18 GMT Message-ID: <3669A741.BBD25734@mediaconsult.com> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 21:36:01 +0000 From: Christof Damian X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.1.131 i586) X-Accept-Language: English, en, , de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org CC: Marc Slemko Subject: Re: Red Hat 5.2 still messed up mime.types? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Marc Slemko wrote: > > Can anyone confirm if a normal install of Apache on Red Hat 5.2 still uses > their own mime.types file instead of the distributed one and if their > mime.types file still doesn't have "htm" included? "htm" seems to be included in mailcap-1.0-7 (RedHat 5.1) and mailcap-1.0-9 (RedHat 5.2) and apache is still using it. damian -- Christof Damian Technical Director http://mediaconsult.com/