httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "RobS" <>
Subject RE: errnos and buff.c
Date Thu, 17 Dec 1998 02:48:41 GMT
> If you want to use a hard_timeout, then I don't think I can really
> recommend that too greatly, but you still have to deal with error returns
> from functions.  Well, you can currently get by without doing so since the
> SIGPIPE will make things work after a few failed writes but that isn't
> reliable nor is it a long term solution since it currently causes
> problems with other sockets that modules may open plus it isn't
> sustainable in a threaded model.

Why is hard_timeout bad?  I thought it was one of those neato features
(aaaaaaaa, times up, your outa here).

What do you expect the threaded solution will look like?


View raw message