Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 9395 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Oct 1998 17:33:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9385 invoked from network); 9 Oct 1998 17:33:34 -0000 Received: from paris.ics.uci.edu (mmdf@128.195.1.50) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 1998 17:33:34 -0000 Received: from kiwi.ics.uci.edu by paris.ics.uci.edu id aa27031; 9 Oct 98 10:03 PDT To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Lost in the noise In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Oct 1998 09:22:40 PDT." <9810090922.aa22368@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 10:03:22 -0700 From: "Roy T. Fielding" Message-ID: <9810091003.aa27031@paris.ics.uci.edu> Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Damn. Nothing annoys me more than tracking down and fixing a bug just after a release and then looking through the PR database and finding a month-old PR that had more than sufficient information for anyone to fix the bug. Does anyone have time to act as a filter on incoming PRs? Basically, that means looking at new reports to see if they have enough information in them to actually track the problem, and then sticking them in STATUS (or forwarding a list of them to new-httpd)? ....Roy