Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 28130 invoked by uid 6000); 23 Oct 1998 03:20:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 28065 invoked from network); 23 Oct 1998 03:20:10 -0000 Received: from mx1.sys.pgh.lycos.com (208.200.146.250) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 1998 03:20:10 -0000 Received: from pghmta2.mis.pgh.lycos.com (pghmta2.mis.pgh.lycos.com [208.200.147.91]) by mx1.sys.pgh.lycos.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/Welcome to Sendmail at Lycos, Inc.) with SMTP id XAA26155 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 23:19:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pghmta2.mis.pgh.lycos.com(Lotus SMTP MTA SMTP v4.6 (462.2 9-3-1997)) id 852566A6.001240C5 ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 23:19:22 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: LYCOS From: srobb@lycos.com To: new-httpd@apache.org Message-ID: <852566A6.00114753.00@pghmta2.mis.pgh.lycos.com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 23:18:39 -0400 Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows NT Server Migration Lab (fwd) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org I just had a chance to look at the document, particularly the migration options... it would be interesting to take the comparison of how to set various options in IIS4 and switch the sense of the comparison, for example: Feature Apache IIS 4.0 ------- ------ ------- UserDir Yes No Apache allows server administrators to designate a default directory for ISP user HTTP directories. AddDescription Yes No Apache allows users to designate a file description for display during directory browsing. I also noted that the IIS migration docs simply ignore any features that Apache has, but IIS lacks... shouldn't suprise me, I guess. -Samrobb -srobb@lycos.com Ed Korthof on 10/21/98 02:57:23 PM Please respond to new-httpd@apache.org To: new-httpd@apache.org cc: (bcc: Sam Robb/Lycos) Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows NT Server Migration Lab (fwd) I'd love to write up some copy providing business reasons for switching from IIS to Apache on Unix -- not that it's a hard topic to cover. ;) I found the "sample text" they provide (for mission statements) both disturbing and amusing. It's disturbing because it is such a blatant attempt to provide M$ followers w/ boilerplate text to try to justify the costs of moving to NT. It's amusing because the only reasons I've seen used -- in practice -- for switching to NT as a webserving platform amount to this: "because our client|management demanded it (over our objections)". Ed, who found the piece on single IP which Marc posted a refrence to ("MS trashes itself") wildly amusing On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Michael Anderson wrote: > Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > > I hate to curse, but it's good to know the enemy ;-) > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/workshop/server/migrlab/howto.asp > > Has anyone seen the flip side: A Migration Guide from IIS to Apache? > I'd participate in writing such a doc if it doesn't exist. > > Regards, > > -- > Mike Anderson > Freelance Consultant > http://www.commproc.com > mka@redes.int.com.mx > +52 473 24837 voice/fax > +52 473 25789 voice > Guanajuato, GTO, Mexico > > "If it looks like a bug, waddles like a bug, > and quacks like a bug, its a quack!" >