Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 18706 invoked by uid 6000); 23 Oct 1998 00:25:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 18688 invoked from network); 23 Oct 1998 00:24:58 -0000 Received: from mail-out1.apple.com (17.254.0.52) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 1998 00:24:58 -0000 Received: from mailgate.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out1.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA13982 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:17:30 -0700 Received: from scv4.apple.com (scv4.apple.com) by mailgate.apple.com (mailgate.apple.com - SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:17:24 -0700 Received: from joliet-jake (joliet-jake.apple.com [17.202.40.140]) by scv4.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA34410 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:17:22 -0700 Message-Id: <199810230017.RAA34410@scv4.apple.com> To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Fully qualified names Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:17:22 -0700 From: Wilfredo Sanchez Received: by Apple.Mailer (2.95.2) Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Apache currently will refuse to start up if it can't determine the fully qualified hostname for the local host unless you specify ServerName. This makes a lot of sense when you are on the Internet, since a non-qualified name sent to a browser in a different domain would prove problematic. But, if you have a local LAN--say, in a classroom--then there may be no domain to speficy, and the "unqualified" name is the correct thing. It would be nice if Apache users didn't have to hard-code a name in the the config file in this case, where they may be no DNS in use. What do people think about that? I'd like to remove this failure case, but I imagine that there may be some disagreement here. -Fred --- Wilfredo Sanchez | wsanchez@apple.com | 408.974-5174 Apple Computer, Inc., 1 Infinite Loop 302.4K, Cupertino, CA 95014 (Mac OS X) Core Operating Systems Group | BSD