Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 16239 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Sep 1998 21:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16156 invoked from network); 9 Sep 1998 21:44:26 -0000 Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (194.128.162.193) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 1998 21:44:26 -0000 Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA25055 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 21:43:35 GMT Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA19550 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 22:43:30 +0100 Message-ID: <35F6F669.DA7E5354@algroup.co.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 22:43:05 +0100 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Group plc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.0/NSPR References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Dean Gaudet wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > I didn't want to replicate effort with the NSPR guys - but I couldn't > > wait, so I've been talking to them anyway - looks like I'll be sorting > > out the working directory thing, at least. > > Right, I don't think you'll step on them at all, they were pretty happy > with the proposal we came up for this. I documented it in one of the > readme files. Yep. That's essentially what I'm planning to implement. It seems to me to be the natural way to do it, anyway. > > Then I was thinking of > > looking more closely at layered I/O - what would be most valuable for me > > is if you could make it clearer where you are at with that, before I > > shoot us _both_ in the foot :-) > > I've done nothing on it... Hmm. You made some cryptic comments, particularly with reference to flushing. A bit of clarity in those comments would be nice (alternatively a licence to ignore them will do). > > Before it confuses you, I should mention I moved your Configuration to > > Configuration.dean to avoid a nasty fight :-) > > Yeah I had work in progress (I forget where it is) that had a top level > make script for folks to build nspr and apache-nspr together... never > finished it/wasn't happy with it. Yeah, well ... I just built against the current NSPR and it seems to work - I'll probably tweak Configure to deal with it all at some point. Not urgent, I feel. > Oh other things you may want to add to your howto doc is "make > BUILD_OPT=1" which builds the non-debugging version of NSPR. Ah, OK. I'll add that. Of course, you can type "cvs ci" as well as I can :-) > I've got lots to do for my real work in the next month, so other than > piping up and spouting my hot breath here I probably won't be committing > much. Of course, every time I say that I write something new. ;) Heh. Well, I'm currently standing in for two developers I haven't got, as well as doing my own work, so count this as a displacement activity :-) Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/ and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk | A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/ London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/ WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.uk/