httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: STATUS note
Date Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:07:23 GMT
Dan Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 11:14:44PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Let's see... first the module checks for db_open in the default lib,
> > then it looks for it in ldb, then it looks for dbopen in the
> > default lib and then dbopen in ldb. So we would run into trouble
> > in just one way, I think.
> > 
> >   1. dbopen is in libc and there is also a libdb that includes
> >      db_open. In this case, pre-1.3.2 versions would use the dbopen
> >      in libc but 1.3.2 would use db_open in libdb. This would be a problem
> >      if dbopen in libc was db1 and libdb was db2 :/
> > 
> > If pre-1.3.2 versions found dbopen in libdb AND dbopen was just a wrapper
> > for db_open in libdb, then it looks like we are OK. In any case, 1.3.2
> > now looks for db_open first.
> 
> I don't THINK that any of the platforms which have db support in libc
> have a db2 implementation as libdb.  The third-party release of libdb2
> installs itself as libdb2.
> 

Gotcha... I'll remove this then, but we'll keep it in mind just in case
we get bug reports.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message