httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: PR#2829 and related ones (semctl)
Date Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:41:32 GMT
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> 
> PR#2829 talks about the same problem a lot of users
> reported on sw-mod-ssl and c.i.w.s.u:
> 
> Under IRIX they get:
> "semctl(IPC_SET): Bad address at server startup"
> 
> That's the semctl from the accept mutex stuff in http_main.c
> The users worked around it by using -DUSE_FCNTL_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT
> on IRIX. Can someone with IRIX experiences look at this, please?
>                                        

Weren't there benchmarks somewhere that detailed if the IRIX shared-mem mutex
was quicker than just using fcntl or maybe even flock?

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   |||   jim@jaguNET.com   |||   http://www.jaguNET.com/
            "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
            cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"

Mime
View raw message