Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 20998 invoked by uid 6000); 3 Aug 1998 18:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20774 invoked from network); 3 Aug 1998 18:15:18 -0000 Received: from cyberc.demon.co.uk (@193.237.161.19) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 1998 18:15:18 -0000 Received: from xgate.cybercities.net (xgate.cybercities.net [194.6.102.2]) by cyberc.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA15508 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:15:13 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:15:13 +0100 (BST) From: David Southwell X-Sender: david@xgate.cybercities.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Module Contrib In-Reply-To: <35C5FBBD.1738DB86@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > David Southwell wrote: > > > > A. do we want to do something that holds all the kinda stuff I > > indicated? > > IMO, yes. > > > 1 If YES there seems to be two main choices to make: > > (i) Use the same physical server as www.apache.org > > If YES then > > (a) use the same www.apache.org/somethingpath or > > (b) Use a different URL altgether with a HTTP ref > > from www.apache.org > > IMO, option [b]. Fine by me -- anyone object stronly -- time for strong opinions!! ;=P Anyone want to take responsibility for doing it -- I am willing to help out in any way I think it should be a kind of editorial responsibility -- David Southwell Chairman CyberCity Ltd (European agents for CyberCity Inc. BVI) +44 117 955 8225 CyberCity Technology in Europe BCDP Technology ++Beyond the Corporate Doorway Processing Solutions++