Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980806150602.00995680@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:06:02 -0400
To: new-httpd@apache.org
From: Doug MacEachern <dougm@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: 2 more API thingies
In-Reply-To: <19980805192016.A12645@engelschall.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org

At 07:20 PM 8/5/98 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
>In article <3.0.5.32.19980805104114.00973a00@pop.ma.ultranet.com> you wrote:
>> At 08:13 AM 8/5/98 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>>>
>>>In article <3.0.5.32.19980804150409.009622a0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> you
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the is_HTTP_*() macros have the ap_ prefix?
>>>
>>>They should, because they are used also inside modules and
>>>not only the core code:
>> exactly.
>> [...]
>>>Feel free to rename them to ap_is_xxxx!
>
>> Don't you have a script to do this already?  Seems like a simple enough
>> task, just rename in the source files and add to ap_compat.h, right?
>>[...]
>
>We have one, yes: csubst. It stays under src/test/rename/. But when you want
>and others are also +1 on this change I can do it for you, of course.  No
>problem.

I'll leave it in your trusty hands then :-)

-Doug