Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 472 invoked by uid 6000); 9 Aug 1998 15:56:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 464 invoked from network); 9 Aug 1998 15:56:01 -0000 Received: from devsys.jagunet.com (206.156.208.6) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 1998 15:56:01 -0000 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.9.1/jag-2.4) id LAA23246 for new-httpd@apache.org; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 11:55:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <199808091555.LAA23246@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_config.c http_protocol. To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 11:55:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Lars Eilebrecht" at Aug 9, 98 04:59:22 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > > According to Roy T. Fielding: > > > Jim volunteered to add config stuff to correspond to the limits, i.e. > > LimitRequestLine, LimitRequestFields, LimitRequestFieldSize and > > LimitRequestBody directives that can only be set in RSRC_CONF > > (since they need to be active before the request is received). > > Hmmm... do we really need config directives for the different limits? > IMHO the defaults are fine for most users. > Look at the CacheDirLevels/Length directives, only a few users really need to > tune the default settings, nevertheless many use the directives and encounter > problems due to foolish values. > Well, I'm sure that people will want to muck around with them. They will be top-level server parameters in any case. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"